Do speakers converge rhythmically? A study on segmental timing properties of Grison and Zurich German before and after dialogical interactions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/loquens.2021.078

Keywords:

phonetic convergence, speech rhythm, dialects in contact, speech production

Abstract


This paper reports on the results of a research investigating whether rhythmic features, in terms of segmental timing properties, are object of speaker’s adjustments after the exposure to a conversational partner. In the context of dialects in contact, this is crucial to understand whether rhythmic attributes may bring about language variation and change. In the context of human-machine interactions, this can benefit the design of spoken dialogues systems to achieve human-likeness. To study rhythmic accommodation, we selected a corpus of pre- and post-dialogue recordings, performed by 18 speakers of Grison and Zurich German (henceforth GRG and ZHG), two Swiss German dialects characterised by noticeable segmental and supra-segmental differences. To quantify rhythmic convergence, we designed three measures based on the segmental timing differences between the two dialects. We compared the Euclidean distances in the three measures between GRG and ZHG speakers in a pair before and after two interactions. Results reveal that dyads members do not significantly shift the production of segmental timing features after the dialogues. Neither linguistic nor social factors can account for the observed accommodation pattern. Cross-dialectal segmental timing differences, captured by the three ratio measures, may be either robust against the influence of interlocutors’ acoustic behaviour or too subtle to be perceived or retained after interactions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abel J. & Babel M. (2017). Cognitive load reduces perceived linguistic convergence between dyads. Language and Speech, 60(3), 479-502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830916665652 PMid:28915780

Babel, M. (2010). Dialect divergence and convergence in New Zealand English. Language in Society, 39(4), 437-56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000400

Babel, M. (2012). Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 177-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.09.001

Babel, M., McAuliffe, M., & Haber, G. (2013). Can mergers-in-progress be unmerged in speech accommodation? Frontiers in Psychology, 4(653), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00653 PMid:24069011 PMCid:PMC3781342

Babel, M., McGuire, G., Walters, S. & Nicholls, A. (2014). Novelty and social preference in phonetic accommodation. Laboratory Phonology, 5(1), 123-150. https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2014-0006

Bell, A. (2001). Back in style: Reworking audience design. In P. Eckert, & J. R. Rickford (Eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation (pp. 139-169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613258.010

Bell, L., Gustafson, J., & Heldner, M. (2003). Prosodic adaptation in human-computer interaction. International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, (ICPhS), Barcelona, 2003, 2453-2456.

Beňuš, Š. (2014). Social aspects of entrainment in spoken interaction. Cognition Computing, 6, 802-813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-014-9261-4

Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75(2), B13-B25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00081-5

Brennan, S. E. (1996). Lexical entrainment in spontaneous dialog. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Spoken Dialogue, Philadelphia, PA, 41-44.

Cerda-Oñate, K., Toledo Vega, G., & Ordin, M. (2021). Speech rhythm convergence in a dyadic reading task. Speech Communication, 131, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2021.04.003

Clopper, C. G. & Dossey, E. (2020). Phonetic convergence to Southern American English: Acoustics and perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(1), 671-671. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0000555 PMid:32007019

Cohen Priva, U. & Sanker, C. (2018). Distinct behaviors in convergence across measures. Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Madison, WI, 1518-1523.

Chartrand, T. L. & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception- behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893 PMid:10402679

Christen, H., Glaser, E., & Friedli, M. (2010). Kleiner Sprachatlas der deutschen Schweiz. Frauenfeld: Huber Frauenfeld.

Dellwo, V., Huckvale, M., & Ashby, M. (2007). How is individuality expressed in voice? An introduction to speech production and description for speaker classification. In C. Müller (Ed.), Speaker Classification I (pp. 1-20), LNAI 4343. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74200-5_1

Dellwo, V. (2006). Rhythm and speech rate: A variation coefficient for C. In P. Karnowski & I. Szigeti (Eds.), Language and Language-Processing (pp. 231-241). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Dellwo, V., Leemann, A., & Kolly, M.-J. (2015). Rhythmic variability between speakers: Articulatory, prosodic, and linguistic factors. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(3), 1513-1528. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4906837 PMid:25786962

Dijksterhuis, A. & Bargh J. A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: Automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 33, (pp. 1-40). San Diego: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80003-4

Dufour, S. & Nguyen, N. (2013). How much imitation is there in a shadowing task? Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00346 PMid:23801974 PMCid:PMC3689145

Eckhardt, O. (1991). Die Mundart der Stadt Chur. Zürich: Phonogrammarchiv der Universität 624, Zürich.

Edlund, J., Heldner, M. & Hirschberg, J. (2009). Pause and gap length in face-to-face interaction. 10th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, 2779-2782. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2009-710

Ferguson, C. A. (1975). Towards a characterization of English foreigner talk. Anthropological Linguistics, 17, 1-14.

Fernald A., Taeschner T., Dunn J., Papousek M., de Boysson-Bardies B., & Fukui I. (1989). A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers' and fathers' speech to preverbal infants. Journal of Child Language, 16(3), 477-501. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900010679 PMid:2808569

Fleischer, J. & Schmid, S. (2006). Zurich German. Journal of the International Phonetics Association, 36, 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100306002441

Fuchs, R. (2015). You're not from around here, are you? Dialect discrimination experiment with speakers of British and Indian English. In E. Delais-Roussarie, M. Avanzi, & S. Herment (Eds.), Prosody and Language in Contact (pp. 123-148). Berlin: Springer.

Gessinger, I., Möbius, B., Le Maguer, S., Raveh, E., & Steiner, I. (2021). Phonetic accommodation in interaction with a virtual language learning tutor: A Wizard-of-Oz study. Journal of Phonetics, 86, 101029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101029

Giles, H. & Ogay, T. (2007). Communication accommodation theory. In B. B. Whaley & W. Samter (Eds.), Explaining Communication: Contemporary Theories and Exemplars (pp. 293-310). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Giles, H., Coupland, N. & Coupland, J. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics (pp. 1-68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511663673

Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105(2), 251-279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.251 PMid:9577239

Goldinger, S. D. & Azuma, T. (2004). Episodic memory reflected in printed word naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(4), 716-722. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196625 PMid:15581123

Grabe, E. & Low, E. L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In N. Warner & C. Gussenhoven (Eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology 7 (pp. 515-546). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197105.2.515

Gregory, S. W. & Webster, S. (1996). A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1231-1240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1231 PMid:8667163

Hazan, V. & Baker, R. (2011). Acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech produced with communicative intent to counter adverse listening conditions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130, 2139-2152. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3623753 PMid:21973368

He, L., & Dellwo, V. (2016). The role of syllable intensity in between-speaker rhythmic variability. International Journal of Speech, Language, and the Law, 23(2), 243-275. https://doi.org/10.1558/ijsll.v23i2.30345

Kemper, S. (1994). Speech accommodations to older adults. Aging and Cognition, 1, 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09289919408251447

Lakin, J. L. (2013) Behavioral mimicry and interpersonal synchrony. In J. A. Hall & M. L. Knapp (Eds.), Nonverbal Communication (pp. 539-576). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238150.539

Leemann, A. (2012). Swiss German Intonation Patterns. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.10

Leemann, A., Dellwo, V., Kolly, M. J., & Schmid, S. (2012). Rhythmic variability in Swiss German dialects. 6th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Shanghai, China, 607-610.

Leemann, A., Kolly, M.-J., & Dellwo, V. (2014). Speaker-individuality in suprasegmental temporal features: Implications for forensic voice comparison. Forensic Science International, 238, 59-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2014.02.019 PMid:24675042

Leemann, A., Kolly, M.-J., Nolan, F., & Y. Li (2018). The role of segments and prosody in the identification of a speaker's dialect. Journal of Phonetics, 68, 69-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.02.001

Leong V., Kalashnikova, M., Burnham, D., & Goswami, U. (2017). The Temporal Modulation Structure of Infant-Directed Speech. Open Mind: Discoveries in Cognitive Science, 1, 78-90. https://doi.org/10.1162/OPMI_a_00008

Levitan, R. & Hirschberg, J. B. (2011). Measuring acoustic-prosodic entrainment with respect to multiple levels and dimensions. In P. Cosi, R. De Mori, G. Di Fabbrizio, & R. Pieraccini (Eds.), Interspeech 2011, 3081-3084. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2011-771

MacLeod, B. (2012). The Effect of Perceptual Salience on Phonetic Accommodation in Cross-Dialectal Conversation in Spanish. Dissertation. Toronto: University of Toronto.

Manson, J. H., Bryant, G. A., Gervais, M. M., & Kline, M. A. (2013). Convergence of speech rate in conversation predicts cooperation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(6), 419-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.08.001

Michalsky, J., Schoormann H. (2017). Pitch convergence as an effect of perceived attractiveness and likability. Interspeech. Stockholm, 2253-2256. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2017-1520

Mitterer, H. & Müsseler, J. (2013). Regional accent variation in the shadowing task: Evidence for a loose perception-action coupling in speech. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 75, 557-575. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0407-8 PMid:23345089

Nielsen, K. (2011). Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 39(2), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.12.007

Pardo, J. S., Gibbons, R., Suppes, A., & Krauss, R. M. (2012). Phonetic convergence in college roommates. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 190-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.10.001

Pardo, J. S., Urmanche, A., Wilman, S., & Wiener, J. (2017). Phonetic convergence across multiple measures and model talker. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(2), 637-659. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1226-0 PMid:27826946

Pardo, J. S., Urmanche, A., Wilman, S., Wiener, J., Mason, N., Francis, K., & Ward, M. (2018). A comparison of phonetic convergence in conversational interaction and speech shadowing. Journal of Phonetics, 69, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.04.001

Payne, E., Post, B., Astruc, L., Prieto, P., & Vanrell, M. (2009). Rhythmic modification in child directed speech. Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology & Phonetics, 12, 123-144.

Pentland, A. (2008). Honest Signal: How They Shape Our World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8022.001.0001

Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 169-190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04000056 PMid:15595235

Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2006). Alignment as the basis for successful communication. Research on Language and Computation, 4 (2-3), 203-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11168-006-9004-0

Raveh, E., Siegert, I., Steiner, I., Gessinger, I., & Möbius B. (2019). Three's a crowd? Effects of a second human on vocal accommodation with a voice assistant. Interspeech 2019. Graz, 4005-4009. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2019-1825

Reitter, D., Moore, J. D., & Keller, F. (2006). Priming of syntactic rules in task-oriented dialogue and spontaneous conversation. In R. Sun (Ed.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 685-690). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Ross, J. P., Lilley K. D., Clopper, C. G., Pardo, J. S., & Levi, S. V. (2021). Effects of dialect-specific features and familiarity on cross-dialect phonetic convergence. Journal of Phonetics, 86, 101041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101041

Ruch, H. (2015). Vowel convergence and divergence between two Swiss German dialects. 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow, UK.

Ruch, H. (2018). The role of acoustic distance and sociolinguistic knowledge in dialect identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 818. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00818 PMid:30072927 PMCid:PMC6058073

Ruch, H., Zürcher Y., & Burkart J. (2017). The function and mechanism of vocal accommodation in humans and other primates. Biological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12382 PMid:29111610

Sancier, M. L. & Fowler, C. A. (1997). Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 421-436. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0051

Sanker, C. (2015). Comparison of phonetic convergence in multiple measures. Cornell Working Papers in Phonetics and Phonology 2015, 60-75.

Schweitzer, A. & Lewandowski, N. (2014). Social factors in convergence of F1 and F2 in spontaneous speech. International Seminar on Speech Production, Cologne. https://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/documents/team/schweitz/docs/SchweitzerLewandowski2014.pdf

Shockley, K., Sabadini, L., & Fowler, C. A. (2004). Imitation in shadowing words. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(3), 422-429. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194890 PMid:15283067

Soderstrom M. (2007). Beyond babytalk: Re-evaluating the nature and content of speech input to preverbal infants. Developmental Review, 27(4), 501-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.06.002

Soliz, J. & Giles, H. (2016). Relational and identity processes in communication: A contextual and meta-analytical review of Communication Accommodation Theory. Annals of the International Communication Association, 38(1), 107-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2014.11679160

Van Engen, K. J., Baese-Berk, M., Baker, R. E., Choi, A., Kim, M., & Bradlow, A. R. (2010). The Wildcat Corpus of native-and foreign-accented English: Communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles. Language and Speech, 53(4), 510-540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830910372495 PMid:21313992 PMCid:PMC3537227

Walker, A. & Campbell-Kibler, K. (2015). Repeat what after whom? Exploring variable selectivity in a cross-dialectal shadowing task. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(546). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00546 PMid:26029129 PMCid:PMC4428063

Walters, S. A., Babel, M. E., & McGuire, G. (2013). The role of voice similarity in accommodation. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 19(1), 060047.58. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4800716

Ward, A. & Litman, D. (2007). Automatically measuring lexical and acoustic/prosodic convergence in tutorial dialogue corpora. In SLaTE Speech and Language Technology in Education 2007.

White, L. & Mattys, S. L. (2007). Calibrating rhythm: First language and second language studies. Journal of Phonetics, 35(4), 501-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2007.02.003

Zellou, G., Scarborough, R., & Nielsen, K. (2016). Phonetic imitation of coarticulatory vowel nasalization. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(5), 3560-3575. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4966232 PMid:27908038

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Pellegrino, E. ., Schwab, S. ., & Dellwo, V. . (2021). Do speakers converge rhythmically? A study on segmental timing properties of Grison and Zurich German before and after dialogical interactions. Loquens, 8(1-2), e078. https://doi.org/10.3989/loquens.2021.078

Issue

Section

Articles