Morphological effects on Pali gemination: A preliminary study

Benjamin Schmeiser

doi:10.3989/loquens.2022.e095

Authors

Benjamin Schmeiser Illinois State University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4118-2923

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/loquens.2022.e095

Keywords:

Pali, gemination, regressive and progressive assimilation, consonant clusters

Abstract

Around the turn of the 20th century (Childers, 1879; Müller, 1884; Whitney, 1889; Gray, 1899; Duroiselle, 1906), neogrammarians began studying the Pali language and its grammar. One area of particular interest was the phonological process of assimilation. Pali evidences both progressive and regressive assimilation and it is generally the case that a consonant geminate is formed (Krishnaswamy, et al., 2019). Recent studies (Junghare, 1979; Suzuki, 2002a,b; Gupta, 2003; Schmeiser, 2008; Dutta, 2017) have attempted to explain base-medial consonant gemination in phonological terms.

Though these accounts have furthered our understanding of Pali base-medial consonant gemination, very few studies have considered morphological effects on Pali gemination. The current study, though exploratory in nature, suggests that a problem arises in phonological analyses of Pali geminates in that Pali words evidence different cluster realizations based on morphological factors. In short, the study analyzes the effects of affixes on Pali gemination and suggests that an explanation based solely on syllable structure or sonority is insufficient and calls for further research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Browman, C. & L. Goldstein (1989). Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology, 6, 201-251.

Browman, C. & L. Goldstein (1990). Gestural specification using dynamically-defined articulatory structures. Journal of Phonetics, 18, 299-320.

Browman, C. & L. Goldstein (1991). Gestural structures: Distinctiveness, phonological processes, and historical change. In I. Mattingly and M. Studdert-Kennedy (Eds.), Modularity and the Motor Theory of Speech Perception (pp. 313-338). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Browman, C. & L. Goldstein (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49, 155-180.

Byrd, D. (1994). Articulatory Timing in English Consonant Sequences. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

Byrd, D. (1996). A Phase Window framework for articulatory timing. Phonology, 13, 139-169.

Childers, R. C. (1879). On sandhi in Pali. The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of England and Ireland, 11, 99-121.

Collins, S. (2006). A Pali Grammar for Students. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Silkworm Books.

Cser, A. (2000). Phonological models of sonority. The Even Yearbook, 4, 1-18.

Dutta, H. (2017). Strength asymmetries and Pali geminates: An OT account. The EFL Journal, 8(1), 49-65.

Downing, L. (2005). On the ambiguous segmental status of nasals in homorganic NC sequences. In M. van Oostendorp & J. Maarten van de Weijer (Eds.), The Internal Organization of Phonological Segments (pp. 183-216). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Duroiselle, C. (1906). A Practical Grammar of the Pali Language. Rangoon, Burma: Rangoon College.

Fábregas, A., & M. Krämer (2020). Why prefixes (almost) never participate in vowel harmony. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory, 2(1), 84-111.

Gordon, R. (Ed.) (2005). Ethnologue: Languages of the World. Dallas, TX: SIL International (15th Edition).

Goswami, A. (2021). Marked geminates as evidence of sonorants in Sylheti Bangla: An optimality account. Acta Linguistica Asiatica, 11(1), 99-112.

Gray, L. (1899). Certain parallel developments in Pali and New Persian phonology. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 20, 229-243.

Gupta, M. (2003). Linguistics in Pali. New Delhi, India: Sundeep Prakashan.

Hankamer, J. & J. Aissen (1974). The sonority hierarchy. In A. Bruck, R. Fox, & M. La Galy (Eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology (pp. 131-145). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

Hock, H. H. (2010). Middle Indo-Aryan “aspirate” clusters revisited. Studia Orientalia Electronica, 108, 87-102.

Jespersen, O. (1909). A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part I: Sounds and Spellings. Heidelberg: Carl Winter,ç. Cited in I. Junghare (1979). Topics in Pali Historical Phonology. Delhi, India: Motilal Banarsidass.

Jun, J. (1994). A constraint-based analysis of place assimilation typology. Studies in the Linguistics Sciences, 24, 263-277. Cited in Y. Suzuki (2002b). Consonant cluster changes in Pali: Toward restricting the phonological patterns: Part 2. Journal of Inquiry and Research, 76, 63-86.

Jun, J. (1995). Perceptual and articulatory factors in place assimilation: an Optimality Theoretic approach. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles. Cited in Y. Suzuki (2002b). Consonant cluster changes in Pali: Toward restricting the phonological patterns: Part 2. Journal of Inquiry and Research, 76, 63-86.

Junghare, I. (1979). Topics in Pali Historical Phonology. Delhi, India: Motilal Banarsidass.

Kessler, B. (1994). Sandhi and syllables in Classical Sanskrit. In E. Duncan, D. Fargas, & P. Spaelti (Eds.), The Proceedings of the Twelfth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) (pp. 35-50). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Krishnaswamy, M., I. Dutta, & U. Banerjee (2019). Active cavity expansion through lingual adjustments to place of constriction in voiced geminates. In Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 175ASA, vol. 33(1), p. 060002. Acoustical Society of America.

Kubozono, H. (Ed.). (2017). The Phonetics and Phonology of Geminate Consonants (Vol. 2). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lahiri, A., & J. Hankamer, (1988). The timing of geminate consonants. Journal of Phonetics, 16(3), 327-338.

Müller, E. (1884). A Simplified Grammar of the Pali Language. Cambridge, Mass.: Andober Theological Seminary.

O’Bryan, M. (1971). Some problems with i-insertion in Pāli. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences: Illinois Working Papers, 1(1), 29-50. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/26679.

Palaschke, M. & W. Dressler (1999). Middle Indic formation: syllable structure vs. natural processes. The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics, 53-68.

Rice, K. (1990). Predicting rule domains the phrasal phonology. In S. Inkelas & D. Zec (Eds.), The Phonology-Syntax Connection, (pp. 289-312). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Schmeiser, B. (2008). A gestural approach to gemination and nasals in Pali. In E. Tummons & S. Lux (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2007 Mid-America Linguistics Conference: Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 30., 302-314.

Selkirk, E. (1980). Prosodic domains in phonology: Sanskrit revisited. Juncture, 7, 107-129.

Suzuki, Y. (2002a). Consonant cluster changes in Pali: Toward restricting the phonological patterns: Part 1. Journal of Inquiry and Research, 75, 97-125.

Suzuki, Y. (2002b). Consonant cluster changes in Pali: Toward restricting the phonological patterns: Part 2. Journal of Inquiry and Research, 76, 63-86.

Whitney, W. (1889). Sanskrit Grammar: Including both the Classical Language, and the Older Dialects, of Veda and Brahmana. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Wilson, C. (2001). Consonant cluster neutralisation and targeted constraints. Phonology, 18, 147-197.

Wright, J. C. (2002). The Pali Subodhālankāra and Dandin’s Kāvyādarśa. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 65(2), 323-341.

Yu Cho, Y. M. (1995). In defense of juncture rules/constraints. 어학연구. Language Research, 31(4), 1-26.