Rule Interaction Conversion Operations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/loquens.2019.062

Keywords:

theoretical phonology, rule ordering, conversion operations

Abstract


Different types of interactions between pairs of phonological rules can be converted into one another using three formal operations that we discuss in this article. One of these conversion operations, rule re-ordering (here called swapping), is well-known; another, flipping, is a more recent finding (Hein et al., 2014). We introduce a third conversion operation that we call cropping. Formal relationships among the members of the set of rule interactions, expanded by cropping beyond the classical four (feeding, bleeding, counterfeeding, and counterbleeding) to include four more (mutual bleeding, seeding, counterseeding, and merger), are identified and clarified. We show that these conversion operations exhaustively delimit the set of possible pairwise rule interactions predicted by conjunctive rule ordering (Chomsky & Halle, 1968), and that each interaction is related to each of the others by the application of at most two conversion operations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baković, E. (2007). A revised typology of opaque generalisations. Phonology, 24, 217–259. ROA-850, Rutgers Optimality Archive, http://roa.rutgers.edu.

Baković, E. (2011). Opacity and ordering. In J. A. Goldsmith, J. Riggle, & A. C. L. Yu (Eds.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory (pp. 40–67). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2nd edition.

Baković, E. (2013a). Blocking and Complementarity in Phonological Theory. London: Equinox.

Baković, E. (2013b). Defining phonological interactions with string set intersection. Handout, WOpiG, Workshop on Opacity in Grmmar, Leipzig.

Baković, E., & Blumenfeld, L. (2017). The interaction of phonological maps: a set-theoretic typology. Presented at the Montréal-Ottawa-Toronto (MOT) Phonology Workshop, UQAM.

Baković, E., & Blumenfeld, L. (2018a). A formal typology of map interactions. Presented at the Sound Workshop, University of Massachusetts Linguistics Department, March 2018.

Baković, E., & Blumenfeld, L. (2018b). Overapplication conversion. In R. Bennett, A. Angeles, A. Brasoveanu, D. Buckley, N. Kalivoda, S. Kawahara, G. McGuire, & J. Padgett, J. (Eds.), Hana-Bana (花々): A Festschrift for Junko Ito and Armin Mester (pp. 1–11). Department of Linguistics, University of California Santa Cruz.

Baković, E., & Blumenfeld, L. (2019). A typology of map interactions. Manuscript in preparation, UC San Diego and Carleton University.

Chafe,W. L. (1968). The ordering of phonological rules. International Journal of American Linguistics, 34, 115–136.

Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.

Doke, C. M. (1938). Textbook of Lamba Grammar. Johannesburg: Witswatersrand University Press.

Hein, J., Murphy, A., & Zaleska, J. (2014). Rule flipping and the feeding-bleeding relationship. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte, 92, 1–31.

Heinz, J. (2016). The computational nature of phonological generalizations. In L. Hyman & F. Plank, F. (Eds.), Phonological Typology, Phonetics and Phonology (pp.126–195). The Hague: Mouton.

Kenstowicz, M. J., & Kisseberth, C. W. (1979). Generative Phonology: Description and Theory. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Kiparsky, P. (1968). Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In E. Bach & R. T. Harms (Eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory (pp.170–202). New York: Holt, Reinhart, and Winston. Reprinted in Explanation in Phonology (pp. 3–55), Dordrecht: Foris, 1982.

Kiparsky, P. (1973). How abstract is phonology? In O. Fujimura (Ed.), Three Dimensions of Linguistic Theory. Part I: Phonological Representations (pp. 5–56). Tokyo: TEC. Reprinted in Explanation in Phonology (pp. 119–163), Dordrecht: Foris, 1982.

Kiparsky, P. (1993). Blocking in nonderived environments. In S. Hargus & E. M. Kaisse (Eds.), Studies in Lexical Phonology (pp. 277–313). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Koutsoudas, A., Sanders, G., & Noll, C. (1974). On the application of phonological rules. Language, 50, 1–28.

McCarthy, J. J. (1991). Synchronic rule inversion. In L. A. Sutton, C. Johnson & R. Shields (Eds.), Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.192–207.

McCarthy, J. J. (1999). Sympathy and phonological opacity. Phonology, 16, 331–399.

Prince, A. (2007). In pursuit of theory. In de Lacy, P. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology (pp. 33–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Vennemann, T. (1972). Rule inversion. Lingua, 29, 209–242.

Zwicky, A. (1987). Rule interactions: another gloss on K&K. Innovations in Linguistics Education, 5(1),91–111.

Published

2020-04-07

How to Cite

Baković, E., & Blumenfeld, L. (2020). Rule Interaction Conversion Operations. Loquens, 6(2), e062. https://doi.org/10.3989/loquens.2019.062

Issue

Section

Articles