Invading the hearer’s auditory space. A prosodic analysis of Italian insults
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/loquens.2025.e118Keywords:
impoliteness, insults, prosody, pitch range, Italian languageAbstract
Impoliteness is a broad field of research that also encompasses insults, which are forms of verbal attack that involve a degree of injury and social censure. From a linguistic standpoint, insults are characterised by distinctive verbal and non-verbal cues, including specific phonetic and prosodic alterations. The aim of this research was to analyse, for the first time, the prosody of Italian insults using a spectro-acoustic approach. The study utilised data from 15 oral role plays performed by six professional theatre actors. The objective of the study was to investigate the extent to which duration, intensity, and pitch range are employed to convey the specific meaning of an invasion of the listener’s auditory space. The analysis demonstrated that insults exhibited longer nuclear vowels and higher intensity values than the control speech sample. Conversely, the pitch range of the target utterances was narrowed, with the majority of f0 values situated within the high-frequency range.
Downloads
References
Alfonzetti, G. (2017). Questioni di (s)cortesia: Complimenti e insulti. Edizioni Sinestesie.
Álvarez, A., Blondet, M. A. and Darcy, R. (2011). Sobre (des)cortesía y prosodia: una relación necesaria. Oralia, (14), 437-450. https://doi.org/10.25115/oralia.v14i1.8206
Andreeva, B., Bonacchi S. and Barry W. (2016). Prosodic cues of genuine and mock impoliteness in German and Polish, Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech Prosody (pp. 999-1003). https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-205
Anolli, L. and Ciceri, R. (1997). La voce delle emozioni: verso una semiosi della comunicazione vocale non-verbale delle emozioni. Franco Angeli.
Bazzanella, C. (2020). Insulti e pragmatica: complessità, contesto, intensità. Quaderns d'Italià, (25), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/qdi.479
Bianchi, C. (2021). Hate speech. Il lato oscuro del linguaggio. Laterza.
Boersma, P. and Weenink, D. (2024). PRAAT: doing phonetics by computer [computer program]. Version 6.4.13, retrieved from http://www.praat.org/ .
Brown, L. and Prieto, P. (2017). (Im)politeness: prosody and gesture. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh & D. Kádár (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness (pp. 323-355). Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_14
Caballero, J.A., Vergis, N., Jiang, X. and Pell, M. D. (2018). The sound of im/politeness. Speech Communication, (102), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2018.06.004
Chen, A., Gussenhoven, C. and Rietveld, T. (2004). Language-specificity in the perception of paralinguistic intonational meaning. Language and Speech, 47(4), 311-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309040470040101 PMid:16038447
Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 257-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3
Culpeper, J. (2011a). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975752
Culpeper, J. (2011b). It's not what you said, it's how you said it: Prosody and impoliteness. In Linguistic Politeness Research Group (Ed.), Discursive approaches to politeness (pp. 57-83). (Mouton Series in Pragmatics [MSP]; Vol. 8). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110238679.57
Culpeper, J. (2021). Impoliteness and hate speech: Compare and contrast. Journal of Pragmatics, 179(2), 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.019
Culpeper, J., Bousfield, D. and Wichmann, A. (2003). Impoliteness revisited: with special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, (35), 1546-1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00118-2
Feinberg, J., (1985). Offense to others, vol. 2. Oxford University Press.
Guillén-Nieto, V. (2023). Hate Speech: Linguistic Perspectives. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110672619
Idemaru, K., Winter, B., Brown, L. and Oh, G. E. (2020). Loudness Trumps pitch in politeness judgments: evidence from Korean deferential speech. Language and Speech, 63(1), 123-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830918824344 PMid:30732514
Ilie, C., (2001). Unparliamentary language: Insults as cognitive forms of ideological confrontation. In R. Dirven, R. Frank & C. Ilie (Eds,), Language and ideology (pp. 255-264). Volume II: Descriptive cognitive approaches. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.205.14ili
Johnstone, T. and Scherer, K. R. (2000). Vocal communication of emotion. In M. Lewis & J. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotion (2nd ed., pp. 220-235). Guilford Press.
Jucker, A. H. and Taavitsainen, I. (2000). Diachronic speech act analysis. Insults from flyting to flaming. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 1(1), 67-95. https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.1.1.07juc
Kasper G. (2008). Data collection in pragmatics research. In H. Spencer-Oatey (Ed.), Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness (pp. 279-302). Continuum.
Kerr, M. A. and Schneider, B. H. (2008). Anger expression in children and adolescents: A review of the empirical literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(4), 559-577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2007.08.001 PMid:17884263
Landone, E. (2022). Methodology in Politeness Research, Advances in (Im)politeness Studies. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09161-2
Mateo, J. and Yus, F. (2013). Toward a cross-cultural pragmatic taxonomy of insult. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 1(1), 87-114. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.1.1.05mat
McKinnon, S. and Prieto, P. (2014). The role of prosody and gesture in the perception of mock impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research, 10(2), 185-219. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2014-0009
Moïse, C. (2006). Analyse de la violence verbale: quelques principes méthodologiques. In Actes des XXVIese Journées d'étude sur la parole (pp. 103-114).
Niebuhr, O. and Neitsch, J. (2020). On the role of prosody in the production and evaluation of German hate speech. In Proceedings of the 11thInternational Conference on Speech Prosody (pp. 710-714). https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2020-145
Ofuka, E., McKeown, J.D., Waterman, M.G. and Roach, P.J. (2000). Prosodic cues for rated politeness in Japanese speech. Speech Communication, 32(3), 199-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(00)00009-1
Ohara, Y. (2001). Finding one's voice in Japanese: A study of the pitch levels of L2 users. In A. Pavlenko, A. Blackledge, I. Piller & M. Teutsch-Dwyer (Eds.), Multilingualism, Second Language Learning, and Gender (pp. 231-254). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110889406.231
Scherer, K. R., Johnstone, T. and Klasmeyer, G. (2003). Vocal expression of emotion. In R. J. Davidson, H. Goldsmith, & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), Handbook of the affective sciences (pp. 433-456). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195126013.003.0023
Sicoli, M. A., Stivers, T., Enfield, N. and Levinson, S. C. (2015). Marked initial pitch in questions signals marked communicative function. Language and Speech, 58(2), 204-223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830914529247 PMid:26677643
Stadler, S.A. (2007). Multimodal (im)politeness: the verbal, prosodic and non-verbal realization of disagreement in German and New Zealand English. Philologia. Verl. Dr. Kovač.
Tenchini, M. P. and Frigerio, A., (2020). The impoliteness of slurs and other pejoratives in reported speech. Corpus Pragmatics, (4), 273-291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-019-00073-w
Uldall, E. (1960). Attitudinal meanings conveyed by intonation contours. Language and Speech, 3(4), 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096000300403
Van Olmen, D., Anderson, M. and Culpeper, J. (2023). Inherent linguistic impoliteness: The case of insultive YOU+NP in Dutch, English and Polish. Journal of Pragmatics, (215), 22-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.06.013
Vinciguerra, G. (2023a). I meccanismi di intensificazione dell'insulto nella comunicazione mediata dal computer. In V. Caruso, M. Maffia (Eds.), Vecchie e nuove forme di comunicazione diseguale: canali, strutture e modelli, Studi AItLA 17 (pp. 355-372). Officinaventuno.
Vinciguerra, G. (2023b). Tutt'altro che implicito: componenti prosodiche e ritmi elocutivi degli atti linguistici scortesi. Italiano LinguaDue, (15), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.54103/2037-3597/22020
Winter, B. and Grawunder, S. (2012). The phonetic profile of Korean formality. Journal of Phonetics, 40(6), 808-815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2012.08.006
Winter, B., Oh, G.E., Hübscher, I., Idemaru, K., Brown, L., Prieto, P. and Grawunder, S. (2021). Rethinking the frequency code: A meta-analytic review of the role of acoustic body size in communicative phenomena. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 376(1840). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0400 PMid:34719247 PMCid:PMC8558772
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
Funding data
NextGenerationEU
Grant numbers H93C22000620001
